In a stunning turn of events, former President Donald Trump played a pivotal role in brokering an agreement that would bring an end to a decades-long war.
According to Times of India Trump said Russia wants to end the war with Ukraine but they could be dragging their feet.

For months, Trump has been quietly reaching out to world leaders and key military officials, pushing for a peace process that many believed was impossible.
On Tuesday Trumps vision became reality when Russia and Ukraine agreed to “ensure safe navigation, eliminate the use of force and prevent the use of commercial vessels for military purposes in the Black Sea,” according to the White House.

Trump, known for his unpredictable and bold tactics, proposed a high-stakes summit between the leaders of the warring nations. Against all odds, they agreed to meet, and Trump’s diplomatic team worked tirelessly to craft a framework that balanced the interests of both sides.

With his signature no-nonsense approach, he used both carrot and stick, offering economic relief and security assurances in exchange for a ceasefire and a path to long-term peace.

The breakthrough came when Trump presented a comprehensive peace deal that included disarmament measures, a phased withdrawal of foreign military forces, and a significant trade package designed to rebuild war-torn economies.
World leaders were stunned by the results. Critics, who had long dismissed Trump’s foreign policy as erratic, were forced to concede that his unconventional methods had yielded tangible results.

The historic agreement not only promised an end to the fighting but also set the stage for future cooperation between once-hostile nations.

The signing ceremony, held in a neutral city, marked the end of one chapter and the hopeful beginning of another, with Trump standing at the center, claiming his place in the history books as the man who ended the war. While many celebrated the peace deal as a triumph of diplomacy, others questioned its durability.

Experts warned that the underlying issues of the conflict were far from resolved and that the fragile truce could easily break down if not carefully managed.
Trump, however, remained optimistic, vowing to hold all parties accountable through economic incentives and diplomatic pressure.

He promised that, under his watch, the world would see the emergence of a new global order, one where strong leadership and direct action would replace endless negotiation. As the world looked on, it was clear that this was not just the end of a war, but the start of a new phase in international politics, where the unexpected could become the new norm.